r
officers would be allowed to opt in the event of any serious fluctuation in the relative value
and
of the Hong Kong dollar and the £ sterling;
he goes on to argue that this would nullify the
effect of having a fixed rate at all. Obviously
there would be no point in having a fixed rate
if it was intended to abandon it the moment there
was any fluctuation in relative exchange values; but
that was not in fact our proposal. The operative
words in paragraph 4 of my letter of the 22nd April
were "resulting in a substantial increase in the
nominal value of Hong Kong dollar salaries", and
later on "in the event of any future revision of
the salary rates for civil servants in Hong Kong".
The point is this. Officers who opted to convert
their pensions at the fixed rate would thereby
safeguard themselves against having their sterling
pensions reduced as a result of any devaluation of the Hong Kong dollar (though by the same apt they
would deprive themselves of any benefit from a trend
33
| A
in the opposite direction). If, however, a devaluation in the Hong Kong dollar as against the £ sterling were
indeed to take place, it is likely that sooner or
later Hong Kong salaries would be correspondingly
revised in an upward direction. Since pension is based on salary in the concluding years of service, pensions would be correspondingly increased, and
unless we safeguard the position in advance,
this would mean that officers already in the service
who have opted for the fixed rate would benefit twice
over both by the fixed rate itself and by the
increase in pension resulting from the increase in
salary designed to offset the devaluation.
Our/
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.